Alhaji Muhammadu Sanusi II, the Emir of Kano and former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), has stirred fresh debate on the role of traditional institutions in Nigerian governance, asserting that he does not require constitutional backing to offer guidance to national and state leaders.
Speaking on Channels Television’s Morning Brief programme on Wednesday, Sanusi emphasised the enduring relevance of traditional leadership in contemporary governance, arguing that his authority to advise the president, governors, and other public officeholders is rooted in the people he represents rather than the letter of the constitution. “Traditional institutions are key to good governance,” he said, noting that he speaks from a position of moral and social legitimacy.
Sanusi’s comments reflect a broader conversation in Nigerian public life about the place of traditional rulers, whose roles are largely cultural and customary rather than explicitly defined in the 1999 Constitution. While traditional leaders like Sanusi have historically offered counsel to political figures, there has been ongoing debate over whether such roles should have formal constitutional recognition.
The Emir also addressed issues of national development and inclusive governance, underscoring the need for greater women’s participation in political life. Observers say his remarks touch on deeper questions about the nature of authority and civic responsibility in Nigeria’s evolving democratic landscape.
Sanusi, a respected economist before his ascension to the Kano throne, has previously been outspoken on governance, economic policy, and leadership quality in Nigeria. His assertion that he “doesn’t need the constitution” to advise leaders is likely to fuel renewed discussions about the boundaries and influence of traditional institutions vis-à-vis Nigeria’s constitutional framework.
